Nick Clegg under scrutiny by the new Select Committee on Political and Constitutional Reform - Saturday 17th July 2010
A new select committee has been established in this Parliament specifically to scrutinise the programme of Political and Constitutional Reform. Within a day of its establishment an intense two hour session was held with the first of the witnesses to the committee, the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, about the immediate and longer-term reform proposals.
The key principles of the reform programme are, said Mr Clegg:
- That power should be dispersed where possible
- There should be inbuilt checks and balances
- Transparency
- Politicians must be held to greater account
He commented that Britain was “an unusually secretive and over-centralised state”
Mr Clegg said that although the Government's proposal for reform were ambitious and wide-ranging, in many senses it was not new or trying to re-invent the wheel, as many of the proposals under consideration had been the subject of debate for many years - in some cases for decades. He also expressed the view that there was an unprecedented level of underlying consensus between the main political parties in favour of political reform which he hoped would act as a foundation for proposals currently under consideration. He argued that the fact that we are a particularly old democracy put pressure on us as a nation constantly to review our politics and the transparency of government in order to reflect the changing nature of our society.
There would be two waves of legislative activity. The first will involve bills on fixed-term parliaments and the referendum on the Alternative Vote (plus associated boundary revisions) and house of lords reform. The second wave, next year, will include a number of further measures, such as lobbying and reform of the funding of political activity.
Mr Clegg failed to respond to one question from the committee as to whether the proposals should be regarded as the first step towards a written constitution, although he did concede that it might not be desirable to overturn the 'tradition' whereby decisions made in one parliament can be set aside by a future parliament. Asked whether any of the proposals 'went deeper' that statutory law, Mr Clegg responded that proposals, such as the requirement for a higher percentage vote of MPs to secure a dissolution of parliament had 'a sort of tablet of stone feel about them'.
The chairman of the committee noted that the committee was endeavouring to move as rapidly as possible in relation to its scrutiny of the issues to be contained in bills and the referendum proposal which are to be brought forward before the end of the year (a fact which is allowing little time for scrutiny, nothwithstading earlier consensus that pre-legislative scrutiny should be more thorough). Mr Clegg, however, agreed that he was 'unambigously' happy to give the assurance sought by the chairman that the government would allow more time so that all other proposals could be considered in a 'more measured way'.
Mr Clegg discounted concerns that there were likely to be considerable differences in levels of turnout by reason of the proposed referendum on AV coinciding with the parliamentary and assembly elections in Scotland and Wales. He conceded that the AV system was not his first choice of electoral system, as he would prefer a system of proportional representation, however he felt that the merit of the AV system was that it prevented tactical voting and gave people the impression that all of their votes counted, which were both significant improvements over the First Past the Post system. He did not regard the proposed referendum as a stepping stone towards PR - saying 'one referendum on electoral reform is more than enough for the time being.'
The Committee is chaired by Graham Allen MP (Lab), a long term advocate of constitutional reform. There are 12 members (including the Chair) – Nick Boles (Con); Christopher Chope (Con); Sheila Gilmore (Lab); Simon Hart (Con); Tristram Hunt (Lab); Eleanor Laing (Con); Catherine McKinnell (Lab); Sir Peter Soulsby (Lab); Andrew Turner (Con); Stephen Williams (Lib Dem). The committee is to hold its first panel on electoral reform on 22nd July 2010.
The website of the committee can be accessed here. A recording of the complete proceedings can be viewed here.
The Parliamentarty Voting System and Constituencies Bill which would make provision for a referendum on 5th May 2011 on the Alternative Vote (AV) for elections to the House of Commons and reduce the size of the House of Commons was published on July 22nd. The Bill can be accessed here. Explanatory notes on the Bill can be accessed here.
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Bill, also published on July 22nd, can be accessed here. Explanatory notes on the Bill can be accessed here.
More News
AV Referendum Campaign Funding Rules
Fri, 20th August 2010
Following the Electoral Commission's confirmation of funding rules for the AV referendum campaign, we look at how this interesting campaign might evolve, and whether either camp is advantaged from the start.
The Politics of Electoral Reform
Fri, 30th July 2010
A Bill is currently before Parliament to propose a referendum on electoral reform and boundary changes. To date, none of the main political parties has given reasons why a change from our First Past the Post system of electing members to the House of Commons ought to be changed to a system of Alternative Voting. We examine the implications of a change in voting system and look at some of the, perhaps unforeseen, consequences of the changes which the Bill proposes.
What is AV? How would it affect our voting system?
Fri, 13th August 2010
Although people tend to talk about Alternative Voting as if it is a single concept, there are in fact many different variants on the AV system. Our briefing paper gives a clear explanation of the AV system currently proposed by the Government, together with worked examples.
Looking for that special someone: the enduring relationship between politicians and special advisers
Thu, 29th July 2010
We take a look at special advisers, often thought of as a recent phenomenon. However closer examination reveals that special advisers have been around as long as politicians.
House of Lords reform: the Lords are speaking - is anyone listening?
Sun, 11th July 2010
The first weighty debate of proposals to reform the House of Lords took place on 29th June 2010. Though ignored in the media, the debate included some of the most cogently reasoned arguments for and against a move from an appointed to an elected House, with a majority of the 65 peers participating in the debate expressing concern at the prospect of the creation of 'a pale imitation of the House of Commons'.
Experts join calls for joined-up thinking in the scramble for constitutional reform
Sat, 24th July 2010
In a further valuable contribution to the burgeoning debate on constitutional reform in general, and the codification of the British constitution in particular, a group of constitutional experts led by Stephen Hockman QC and Professor Vernon Bogdanor have called for a holistic approach to the constitution. In a paper published by JUSTICE, the group analyses the questions which need resolution before any moves can be made towards the creation of a codified constitution.
Do we need a written constitution?
Fri, 2nd July 2010
Prompted by the recent publication of a book on the subject by Richard Gordon QC, the PR consultancy SPADA recently sponsored a debate on whether the UK now needs a written constitution. Read more, or watch a video of the debate in full.
The Speaker speaks of his plans for the future
Wed, 16th June 2010
The Rt Hon John Bercow, Speaker of the House of Commons outlined his vision of a revitalised chamber of the House of Commons. The new Parliament has seen an encouraging number of new faces in the House taking an active interest in the business of the Chamber. But what will it take to sustain that enthusiasm and reinvigorate debate in the House?
Fear and Lothian in Westminster. The English question is not going to go away
Mon, 7th June 2010
Both the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru have stated that they intend to exploit the hung parliament to their own advantage, once again putting the spotlight on the 'English question' - that Scottish and Welsh MPs may vote in Westminster on issues that affect only England, whilst English MPs have no say in relation to the deliberations of the Scottish parliament or the Welsh assembly. We look at whether there will ever be a solution to this problem.
British politics hits a purple patch. A look at calls for electoral reform
Sat, 29th May 2010
Amid the calls for electoral reform and the coalition government's promise to put the Alternative Voting system to a referendum, we look at what difference a change to the voting system would make. Is democracy in the voting or the counting?
EU Foreign Policy: to boldly go where none has gone before?
Tue, 18th May 2010
The European Union has been criticised in the past for failing to develop a more effective foreign policy, but the External Action Service is supposed to bring new cohesion and coherence to this area of European cooperation. However, the new High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Baroness Ashton, has already run into opposition to her plans and, although a compromise has been struck, the road ahead scarcely looks any easier.
A plea for extra time: PR should not be a political football
Wed, 12th May 2010
The negotiations leading to the formation of the new coalition government have turned, in part, on the question of electoral reform. A matter of such constitutional importance should, it is argued, form part of a wider review of the constitution and should not be used merely as a political bargaining chip. Will sufficient time be given to consider the implications of change before reforms are pushed through?
Should civil servants have the tyranny of the first draft? Peter Lloyd considers the Cabinet Secretary’s “Cabinet Manual”
Thu, 6th May 2010
Peter Lloyd questions the provenance of the recently disclosed 'Cabinet Manual'. Amid suggestions that the manual might form the basis of a written constitution, he questions whether it should be for a civil servant to generate the first draft of such a fundamental document.
Sound bites vs. quiet reflection: Better Government requires a considered approach
Sat, 1st May 2010
In a letter published in the Financial Times this week, members of The Constitution Society and the Better Government Initiative outline four basic principles of good government that could improve the legislative process. The principles are difficult to fault, and could be implemented without legislation, but the question will remain whether there is any incentive for politicians to change the way that they behave.
Crisis, What crisis?
Tue, 13th April 2010
At a debate of the Society of Cogers on 19th April 2010, Nat le Roux, Chairman of the Trustees of the Constitution Society, argued that our problem may not lie with our constitution itself, but rather with the conduct of our politicians. He suggested that the single biggest problem of contemporary democracy - is that all politicians are terrified of losing power, because the lesson of the last 30 years is that once you’ve lost power you don’t get it back for a generation.
Rip it up and start again: the only way to deal with the House of Lords?
Mon, 26th April 2010
In an article published for the first time on the ReConstitution website, Professor Dawn Oliver argues that we should resist political pressure to reform the House of Lords by making it an elected body. She proposes abolishing the House of Lords and starting from scratch by the creation of a wholly appointed Commission for Executive Scrutiny, with proposals which chime with views expressed by Lord Bingham.
Chief Civil Servant advises Brown to stay put in event of hung parliament
Thu, 4th March 2010
The head of the Civil Service is warning Gordon Brown not to leave Number 10 if it is unclear who has won the upcoming election. Sir Gus O’Donnell told MPs that it is “the Prime Minister’s duty not to resign” until a successor can be found.
Are new faces enough?
Wed, 21st April 2010
Will the problems with Parliament be solved by the retirement of many of the worst expenses offenders and an influx of new MPs? There is a perceptible mood for change amongst voters, but will altering some of the personnel be enough to restore confidence in both Parliament and the ‘constitution’ of the United Kingdom?
Reform sidelined as 'wash up' commences
Wed, 7th April 2010
Campaigners are expressing their dismay, as the government’s legal commitment to hold a referendum on reforming the electoral system looks set to be scrapped as part of the ‘wash up’.
Anti-corruption campaigner brands 'wash up' a
Mon, 29th March 2010
Legendary anti-corruption campaigner Martin Bell is spearheading a campaign to make the ‘wash up’ more transparent. Mr Bell is criticizing the process, which takes place during the final days of a parliament to try and get as many of the remaining bills finished as possible, as a “stitch-up by and for the main political parties”.
Jack Straw attacks Cameron's plans to reduce number of MPs
Wed, 17th March 2010
A senior government minster has laid into David Cameron’s plans to reduce the number of MPs should he get into power.
Libel judge defends privacy law
Mon, 15th March 2010
The controversial libel judge at the centre of a storm over the development of privacy law in the UK has hit back at his tabloid critics. Justice Eady, who rose to notoriety after punishing the News of the World for publishing intimate photos of Formula 1 boss Max Mosely’s private life, accused tabloids of having a vested interest in stunting privacy for financial gain.
Senior Tory calls for Lords Reform
Wed, 10th March 2010
A senior Tory is expressing her support for an elected House of Lords. Margot James, a vice-chairwoman of the Conservative party, made the announcement during an interview with Reconstitution where she claimed the current system was “out of kilter”.
Expert calls for Government to follow through on reform
Mon, 8th March 2010
Academics are calling for “immediate assurances” from the government that it will implement the recently agreed Wright reforms before the end of this parliament. Dr Meg Russell of the UCL Constitution Unit warned them “this is the timetable the Commons voted for and party leaders must work together to honour that.”
Controversy over whether reform goes far enough
Tue, 23rd February 2010
The parliamentary reform movement is split over whether the proposed Wright Reforms go far enough.
Better Government Initiative
Mon, 1st February 2010
Better Government Initiative launches major report.